Do you have something on your mind and want to write your own online editorial?
Click here to get started!

Back Door Politics?

Date posted - April 8, 2013

It looks like the current administration is going to have a really tough time to get any kind of gun control passed in the country. (or is he?) Is the administration looking at another possible way to keep the populace in control? The president and others have been on a campaign trail to let the people of the United States know that they(he and his administration) really don’t want an armed citizen. I think they have abandoned the conventional path, and have opted for a more subtle way. Here is why:

1st.. The administration backs and supports the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. Sounds like a good deal right? You should read it.

Supposedly this treaty will not control the domestic use of weapons in any country, but it will require countries that ratify it to establish national regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms, parts and components and to regulate arms brokers.” That, my friend, is call “gun registration”. Glock, Heckler & Koch (HK), Fabrique Nationale (FN), Steyr, IMI, and many other manufacturers of common handguns, rifles, and shotguns are international manufacturers. Check out Article 11 and 12 of the treaty. It asks that members maintain records of conventional arms transferred to their territory, and to include in those records (among other things) model/type of arm and the end user’s information. These records are to be kept for a minimum of ten years. This applies to “small arms” acquired from an international source such as the above-listed. Even if you don’t recognize the other names on the list, you have to see that the Glock is one of the most common handgun models in the entire world today, and this treaty is asking for its participants to record and report purchasers of these guns to the UN. This isn’t even going into the fact that the treaty has no enforcement plan other than self-regulation. In other words, the good guys will obey and get tracked by the UN, and the bad guys won’t. Now I think we are getting at the heart of why the Obama administration pushed this so hard. Before they can confiscate all the guns they first have to know where they all are. What Obama can not get passed through US law he will try to sneek in the back door through a UN treaty.

2nd…Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret Service agents (not just those guarding the president), and others of the U.S. Secret Service including uniformed division officers, physical security technicians and specialists, and other ‘special officers’, to arrest and remove an elected sheriff for refusing to enforce the law (or anyone breaking the law). The bills being introduced defines law as including any rule, regulation, EXECUTIVE ORDER, court order, statute or constitutional provision. It would establish federal authority police powers in a State, enabling an enforcement arm reporting directly to the president ( called the Secret Service, is this a new branch similar to Saddam’s Republican Guard, remember him?). Why is he pushing this?

Sure, there is a struggle over language and wording… but you know that there are agenda’s out there that include restricting arms (or ammo, which brings up a whole new point, why can’t you find any ammo on the shelves any more?) to the American people.. ANY WAY THEY CAN.. FRONT DOOR OR BACK DOOR… This president wants control of the United States people. He wants a complete gov’t controlled society. So watch your back…Is he coming after your 2nd amendment rights? (or your 1st, or 3rd,4th….) Does he know that an armed society will stop a complete gov’t takeover? What better way to control a society than to take its ability away to protect themselves and their rights.


Print Friendly

11 Responses to “Back Door Politics?”

  1. Hadaway says:

    Maybe they should make heroin, cocaine & crack illegal to get it off the streets. Oh wait……..

  2. Doug says:

    Good to know that the backbone for the high-capacity magazine ban, is based completely on lies, or utter stupidity.

    During a forum at the Denver Post last week, Rep. Diana DeGette, sponsor of a bill to limit gun magazines explained why a ban on high-capacity magazines would be effective “These are ammunition. They are bullets,” she said. “So the people who have those now, they’re going to shoot them. So, if you ban them in the future, the number of the high-capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.”

    It wasn’t a one-time slip up either.

    A spokeswoman for her office, Juliet Johnson, backed up the claim saying that “she simply misspoke in referring to ‘magazines’ when she should have referred to ‘clips,’ which cannot be reused because they don’t have a feeding mechanism.”

    Dumb and Dumber at the highest levels.

    • Marcus says:

      you’re on target Doug
      how about President Obama, while speaking at a fundraiser in San Francisco last week telling Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee donors that Adam Lanza gunned down 20 children with a fully-automatic weapon. From all press reports the main weapon was a semi automatic AR – there is an important difference which anyone who wanted to be truthful would know. This administration is not being honest with the American public. So much for a fair and needed debate.

  3. The Mountie says:

    Might be time to check for a job in Canada.

  4. 30 - 30 says:

    Could be interesting hunting this fall when you see headlines like this:

    PETA Plans to Fly Drones That Would ‘Stalk Hunters’

  5. Fred says:

    We may have to form citizen militias to protect our friends, (the county sheriffs) from the feds.

  6. Hank Rearden says:

    Molon Labe.

  7. strony web says:

    Freedom is no an option, this is only 1 true right
    we have.

  8. God Help Us Please says:

    Nobody wants listen but Obama is a communist n socialism supporter!! His father was a communist n his wife believes in it as well!! They have a video explaining it all with facts to back it up… It is scary what he is doing to this country!!!

    • Harriet Oleson says:

      Back in Walnut Grove we had a single shot 12 gauge – seemed to be enough to protect us from varmints and things. Also helped with our marksmanship – seems to Pa, Doc Baker and me if you need a 30 round magazine your aim must not be very good…

      • 30 - 30 says:

        Its been awhile glad to hear you’re back in the area after the divorce.
        There you go telling stories again. I remember Mr. Edwards telling me
        you shot #1 buckshot out of that old 12 gauge of yours. Most people know each shotgun shell with #1 buck has 16 pellets in it. Seems to my buddies and I if you couldn’t hit something with 16 pellets you were not a very good shot.

Leave a Reply

Sheldon Broadcasting Company, Inc. appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language.
2. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem (personal) attacks.
3. Threats are treated seriously and will be reported to law enforcement.
4. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Sheldon Broadcasting Company, Inc. or its advertisers agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the selected staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email

Back to:Back Door Politics?